StatsKit vs Split

StatsKit vs Split

Split (now part of Harness) is a feature-delivery and experimentation platform for engineering teams. StatsKit is a conversion and pricing tool for early-stage startups.

7-day free trial. $0 today, cancel anytime.

At a glance

StatsKitSplit
Best forEarly-stage web startupsEngineering teams doing flag-based release and experiments
Pricing7-day free trial, then from $5/moEnterprise (part of Harness)
Low-traffic statsBayesian chance-to-win from first conversionsMetric-impact experimentation, built for scale
Judged on revenueYes, net revenue per 1,000 visitorsMetric-based
Feature flagsBoolean and multivariate, typed SDKYes, with guardrail metrics and monitoring
Replay and surveysBoth includedNo
SetupOne script tagSDKs plus metric integration
Where Split is stronger
  • Ties feature flags to metric impact and monitoring, so engineering teams can measure and safely roll out releases.
  • Enterprise-grade flag management with guardrail metrics and observability integrations, now inside the Harness platform.
Where StatsKit fits better
  • You are optimising marketing-side conversion and pricing, not release safety for a large app.
  • You want a plain probability from low traffic and a one-tag install, not an engineering rollout platform.
  • You want revenue-scored results and a hosted paywall without wiring metrics into your pipeline.

Which should you pick?

Split is aimed at engineering teams that want flag-based release management with metric monitoring, especially within Harness. StatsKit is aimed at early-stage teams optimising conversion and pricing, with turnkey low-traffic stats and revenue scoring.

Frequently asked questions

Is StatsKit a Split alternative?

For conversion and pricing experiments at an early-stage company, yes. Split is the better fit for engineering teams that want flag-based release management and metric monitoring at scale.

See why your visitors don't pay

Install one script, and start finding your leaks today.

Start free trial →